This week in the War, 4–10 November 1940: Election Day

As I write this post on Sunday 4 November 2012, I have no idea who will win Tuesday’s US election. Democrat incumbent Barack Obama is pitted against Republican challenger Mitt Romney, and the race is close.

The economy and entanglement in a foreign war (i.e. in Afghanistan) are major  issues. On Tuesday 6 November, the electorate will decide. People reading this post after that date will, of course, know the outcome.

This week in the war, on Tuesday 5 November 1940, Democrat incumbent Franklin Delano Roosevelt was pitted against Republican challenger Wendell Willkie.

Many of the economic difficulties had already been overcome with the New Deal, but possible entanglement in a foreign war (i.e. in Europe) was a major issue.

On the 5th of November, 1940, Roosevelt spent the evening with his family and friends at his Hyde Park home. At first, the radio reported Willkie to be doing well. Later, Roosevelt began to move ahead and, towards midnight, the outcome appeared clear. As we all know, Franklin Delano Roosevelt was elected for a third term. Churchill was delighted and sent his congratulations. In his book Berlin Diary, American journalist William L. Shirer describes Roosevelt’s victory as “a resounding slap for Hitler and Ribbentrop and the whole Nazi regime.”

Posted in Book, World War II | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on This week in the War, 4–10 November 1940: Election Day

In the news: Princess Noor Inayat Khan

Jane Martinson (The Women’s Blog with Jane Martinson 23 October 2012) recently reported in the British newspaper The Guardian that a statue is soon to be erected in London to honour Princess Noor Inayat Khan.

The princess, who was descended from Indian royalty, was born in Moscow, but later moved with her family to England and then to France. She studied at the Sorbonne in Paris and volunteered as a nurse at the beginning of the war.

After the fall of France, she escaped to England and trained as a wireless operator in the Women’s Auxiliary Air Force (WAAF). Because of her fluency in French, Britain’s Special Operations Executive (SOE) recruited her for clandestine operations in Nazi-occupied Europe.

With a false identity and the code name Madeleine, she flew by Lysander into enemy territory in June 1943. Gestapo tactics were proving increasingly effective, and she narrowly avoided capture in July.  She continued her work as radio operator but only until October, when she was arrested and taken for interrogation to the Gestapo’s Paris headquarters: 43 Avenue Foch.

Almost immediately, she attempted to escape, squeezing through a window and climbing to the roof. She was recaptured.

The subsequent story of her torture and the brutality of her confinement is deeply moving. (She was kept in manacles for ten months). Noor Inayat Khan was murdered at Dachau concentration camp, along with three other SOE women, in September 1944.

In 1949, she became the third SOE female operative to be awarded the George Cross: Odette Sansom survived to receive the award in person and, like Noor Inayat Khan,  Violette Szabo received her GC posthumously.

Further details of the life of Princess Noor Inayat Khan can be found in the book by Marcus Binney: The Women Who Lived For Danger—The Women Agents of SOE in the Second World War (Hodder & Stoughton, 2002).

Posted in In the news, World War II | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on In the news: Princess Noor Inayat Khan

In the news/Vignette: Robot discovers the Lascaux Cave (1940)

According to Tom Kington, recently reporting from Rome for the British newspaper The Guardian (18 October 2012), two men noticed a wandering cat slip through a small opening in a cliff face close to their home in the ancient city. When they followed, they discovered a grotto filled with ancient Roman urns, which experts dated between the first and second centuries BC.

It is not unique for ancient artifacts to be uncovered by domestic pets. The most famous instance occurred on 12 September 1940. French teenager Marcel Ravidat and three of his friends were out walking with Marcel’s dog, Robot. When Robot fell into a hole that had been made by an uprooted tree, Marcel went after him. The boy slipped all the way to the bottom of a pit and found himself in a cave with brightly covered walls. The site, which is near the village of Montignac in southwestern France, is now called the Lascaux Cave. The walls were covered with paintings that dated from the late Paleolithic era, some 17,000 years ago.

The French can surely be forgiven, if they did not rejoice at this startling discovery. The nation had been defeated earlier in the summer, and much of the country, including Paris, was occupied by the Germans. Faced with severe food rationing, attacks on their colonies by their former British allies, and the struggle to create a fledgling resistance movement, the French had many other things on their minds. Paleolithic art did not put food on the table, or coals in the fireplace, or bring a husband or brother back home. A million and a half French soldiers were still locked away as prisoners-of-war in Germany.

The cave was not opened for public viewing until well after the war had ended.

The cave contains paintings of both animals and humans, plus many abstract designs: close to 2,000 images, in total.

What was the purpose of the paintings? Some scholars have suggested links with astronomy, geometry, spirituality. Others suggest the reasons were more practical: the study of humankind, and of the hunt.

France’s Culture Ministry has produced a video tour. Take a look, and make your own decision: The Lascaux Cave.

Posted in In the news, Vignette, World War II | Tagged , | Comments Off on In the news/Vignette: Robot discovers the Lascaux Cave (1940)

This week in the War, 28 Oct–3 Nov 1940: Emergenza G—Crisis in Greece

The euro: €.

Today, everyone knows that the present decline in the European currency has much to do with the current crisis in Greece. Like anywhere else, Greece has known ups and downs, and will eventually bounce back. Believe me, things were much worse for the Greeks 72 years ago.

This week in the war, at dawn on Monday 28 October 1940, Italian troops stationed in Albania crossed the frontier into Greece. Mussolini had decided to extend Italy’s influence in the Mediterranean by opening up a whole new front.

That morning, he and Hitler met at the Santa Maria Novella Florence railway station in Florence. Hitler had not received advance warning, but had read about the invasion a few hours earlier in the Italian papers. If he was annoyed, he didn’t show it. Maybe he would have done, if he had realized that he would have to bolster the Duce’s ill-conceived adventure by sending German troops into Greece the following spring. The Greek campaign delayed the Wehrmacht’s Operation Barbarossa by a few vital months—enough time for winter to set in and rob Hitler of his chance to capture Moscow.

The British (Empire), on their own since the fall of France, suddenly had a new ally. The Royal Navy and an expeditionary force arrived to support the Greeks.

The Italian invasion, codenamed Emergenza G (in English: Emergency G[reece]), was conducted with little drive or enthusiasm by the forces involved. The Italian leadership was split by personal rivalries. Even the advantage of surprise was missing.

Despite Greece’s lack of tanks and the overwhelming superiority of the Italian air force, the Greeks put up fierce resistance. They were helped by the mountainous terrain along the Albanian-Greek frontier.

The Greeks slowly reinforced their troops along the border and eventually counter-attacked in force, invading and occupying large tracts of Albania.

It was the first major Allied land victory of World War II.

Hitler eventually intervened, although German troops did not cross into Greece until early April, 1941. The campaign ended a few weeks later, when SS-Obergruppenfuehrer Sepp Dietrich accepted the surrender of the Greek army. It was 20 April—Adolf Hitler’s birthday.

Posted in World War II | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on This week in the War, 28 Oct–3 Nov 1940: Emergenza G—Crisis in Greece

This week in the War, 21–27 October 1940: Entering the path of collaboration

This week in the war, on Thursday 24 October, Adolf Hitler and Maréchal Philippe Pétain, the leader of Vichy France, met at Montoire-sur-le-Loire.

In most respects, the two men were remarkably different. Hitler spent his early life as an aspiring, though unsuccessful, artist—often unemployed and, for the most part, self-educated. During World War I, he served in the trenches and attained the rank of corporal.

Pétain was the product of France’s top military academies. He began World War I as a Brigadier General, rose to become the Commander-in-Chief of the French army, and was a Marshal of France by the time the war was over.

Unlike the Fuehrer, Pétain was famous as a womaniser throughout much of his life.

Hitler’s attitude towards France had been altered by Vichy’s spirited defence of Dakar against de Gaulle and the British, and by Vichy’s subsequent bombing of the British naval base at Gibraltar. On 24 September, Hitler authorized Vichy to reequip its air force in North Africa. The softening of Nazi policy prompted Pétain to respond (on 10 October) that France wished to shed its ‘traditional relationships’—meaning, in particular, its close association with Great Britain.

What did Hitler want from Pétain on 24 October 1940?

Basically, Hitler wanted much the same as he’d wanted a day earlier from his meeting with Franco: An alliance against the British.

The Fuehrer’s new Mediterranean strategy would see Spain, France and Italy sealing off the whole of southern Europe and dividing North Africa amongst themselves. If Spain wanted French Morocco and Italy wanted part of French Algeria—then maybe France could be compensated with Nigeria, when the British were finally ousted from western Africa. (But the Hendaye meeting between Hitler and Franco had gone badly. Many aspects of the Fuehrer’s strategy were already moot).

Pétain was presented with two choices:

(1) Bank on the near certainty of a German victory and join the winning side by declaring war against Britain. After all, Britain was already waging war against Vichy by attacking the French fleet and France’s various colonial possessions. If France joined Hitler, she could look forward to receiving generous terms from Germany (a reduction in reparations for the cost of the war, return of French prisoners, etc).

(2) Not enter the war on Germany’s side. If the British lost or negotiated a peace agreement of their own with Hitler, then France would be required to pay large reparations to Germany (as Germany had paid to the Allies at the end of World War I).

Pétain refused to declare war against Great Britain.

Nonetheless, he made world news when he was photographed shaking hands with Germany’s Fuehrer.

When Churchill saw the picture, he was outraged. (He had always considered Pétain to be a defeatist).

When Roosevelt saw the picture, he was convinced Pétain was about to hand over France’s fleet to Hitler.

One immediate consequence of the Montoire meeting was a speech that Pétain broadcast to the French nation on 30 October 1940. He announced that he had decided to enter “the path of collaboration” (d’entrer “dans la voie de la collaboration.”).

The term ‘collaborator’ (in French: ‘collaborateur’ or ‘collabo’) dates from Pétain’s speech. Its derogatory connotation came shortly, though not immediately, thereafter.

Posted in World War II | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on This week in the War, 21–27 October 1940: Entering the path of collaboration

This week in the War, 21–27 October 1940: Turning point at Hendaye

This week in the war, on Wednesday 23 October 1940, Adolf Hitler met with Spanish dictator, Francisco Franco at Hendaye, a small town on the French-Spanish border, at the foot of the Pyrenees. In some respects, the two men were remarkably similar.

Like the Fuehrer, the Caudillo, had a somewhat ‘monkish’ lifestyle. Neither smoked nor drank alcohol. Both avoided being openly involved with women. Both believed their own country to be unquestionably superior to the other nations of Europe.

Hitler’s plan was to secure Spain’s entry into the war. Franco’s recent victory over the Soviet-supported Republicans in Spain’s civil war had been, in a large part, due to German arms and German pilots flying for Franco in the famous Condor Legion. (The Condor Legion‘s former commander, Hugo Sperrle, benefitted from the experience. By the fall of 1940, he was commanding Luftflotte 3 in its Blitz against London).

Hitler offered Franco the British colony of Gibraltar—which, the Fuehrer proposed, would be laid seige to and taken by a joint assault by Spanish and German troops.

But Franco was not persuaded. He demanded seige guns that he knew were not available, grain that Germany could not supply, and French colonial possessions (such as Oran and French Morocco) that Hitler was averse to handing over. Hitler would be meeting with Vichy French leader, Maréchal Philippe Pétain, the following day—and the Fuehrer needed to retain some bargaining chips for dealing with Vichy.

From the German viewpoint, the meeting at Hendaye was a disaster. (“Like having his teeth pulled,” was how Hitler later described it).

In his insightful book Hitler’s Spy Chief—The Wilhelm Canaris Mystery (Phoenix, 2005), Richard Bassett attributes Hitler’s failure at Hendaye to his spy chief Canaris’s plotting with Franco behind the scenes. Canaris had no sympathy for the Nazis.

Regardless of the reason, Hendaye was a turning point in the war. If Britain had lost her naval base in Gibraltar, then she would have lost the whole of the Mediterranean. What would Vichy France have thought? What would America have thought? World opinion would start to see Britain as a ‘loser’. And who wants to support a loser?

Posted in Book, World War II | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on This week in the War, 21–27 October 1940: Turning point at Hendaye

This week in the War, 14–20 October 1940: The Great Dictator

 

 

 

 

 

To quote Charlie Chaplin: “Dictators are comic. My aim is to make people laugh at them.”

This week in the war, on 15 October 1940, the movie The Great Dictator, premiered in New York City.

Chaplin starred in the role of a Jewish barber who is inadvertently mistaken for his country’s evil dictator, Herr Hynkel. The obvious (and hilarious) parallel with Hitler and  the Nazi regime delighted American cinema audiences in the USA, even before the USA had entered the war. The movie became more popular still after Pearl Harbour. Actor Jack Oakie played Benzino Napaloni—a zany take-off on Italy’s Benito Mussolini.

The plot in a nutshell: The Jewish barber (played by Chaplin) is wounded in the trenches during WWI. Twenty years later, his country’s leader, Adenoid Hynkel (also played by Chaplin) is persecuting the Jews and about to invade neighbouring Osterlich. Note that Osterlich is similar to Osterreich, German for Austria.

When the barber escapes from a concentration camp, border guards mistake him for Hynkel. In the meantime, the real dictator has fallen out of a boat while duck hunting. When discovered, he is mistaken for the escaped barber and arrested.

The movie ends with the barber’s triumphant victory speech from the Osterlichian capital, and who should hear him over the radio but Hannah (played by Paulette Goddard). [I hadn’t mentioned Hannah earlier. I was saving her for last].

Hannah is the love interest from the barber’s ghetto days. Finally, they can be reunited.

I wonder if anyone has ever considered the similarity in looks between Paulette Goddard, shown on left during the filming of the movie, and Hitler’s long time mistress, Eva Braun, shown below at the Fuehrer’s Berghof residence, near Berchtesgaden.

Surely, it’s coincidental. Eva was one of the Reich’s best-kept secrets. The Hollywood producers could not possibly have known about her. (Or could they?)

 

Posted in Movie, World War II | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on This week in the War, 14–20 October 1940: The Great Dictator

This fall in the War, September–November 1940: Heading for an election on the 5th of November

This evening (Tuesday 16 October) I watched the American presidential debate on CNN: Obama vs Romney. Politics in the USA are more interesting than any in any other country I can think of—and I’m speaking as outsider. The brilliantly-orchestrated party conventions (and I watched both of them) and the debates will focus discussion from now until 6 November. Election Day.

Remember that in the fall of 1940, two equally vigorous election campaigns were being waged by Democratic incumbent Franklin Delano Roosevelt (shown left signing the Lend-Lease bill) and Republican challenger Wendell Willkie.

There were conventions, but no debates, no internet, no television. FDR did not tweet, nor Wendell Willkie post to FaceBook. The equivalent of a video going viral on YouTube would have been really good coverage in a prominent newspaper. (Now that I think about it, one would need really really really good coverage in a newspaper that sold coast to coast).

An interesting collection of WWII front pages can be found in John Davison’s book Front Page: World War II History in the Headlines (Brown Reference Group, 2009):

‘Willkie would send no troops to war aboard’ is a prominent heading on the front page of the New York Sun (13 September 1940). [Roosevelt would later say the same thing].

‘Willkie tests effects of farm speech’ is the heading of a short column on the front page of the New York World-Telegram (27 September 1940), and describes the Democratic Party’s agricultural program.

And, closer to election day, the top headline of the New York Post (28 October 1940) declares: ‘City Roars Greeting to Roosevelt Today.’ He was scheduled to speak that night in Madison Square Gardens as part of his campaign for re-election.

Posted in World War II | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on This fall in the War, September–November 1940: Heading for an election on the 5th of November

In the news: The White Rabbit

A 23 September 2012 article by Jasper Copping in the British newspaper The Telegraph reviewed Sophie Jackson’s recent biography of the British WWII spy known as The White Rabbit. The White Rabbit was the code name for Wing Commander Forest Frederick Edward Yeo-Thomas, and should not be confused with The White Mouse—which was the code name of the equally famous WWII spy, Nancy Wake.

‘Tommy’, as Yeo-Thomas was known, was born in England but educated in France. The outbreak of war found him working on the rue Royale in Paris. He was a director of Molyneux, the well-known fashion house.

After joining the Royal Air Force Volunteer Reserve (RAFVR) and serving in bomber liaison for a time, he was recruited by Special Operations Executive (SOE) and parachuted into France. He was eventually caught, thrown into Paris’s Fresnes prison, and tortured brutally and at length by the Gestapo. Despite his attempts at denial, the Gestapo were aware of his importance to the French Resistance movement.

Afterwards, he was sent to the infamous Buchenwald concentration camp. He escaped when he and fellow prisoners were shipped out by train, was recaptured and escaped again and finally made contact with an American army unit. Torture, survival, escape. All of this, would be ample material on which to base a spy thriller—perhaps even a series of spy thrillers.

That is precisely the thesis of Sophie Jackson’s carefully researched biography, Churchill’s White Rabbit: The True Story of a Real-Life James Bond. Ms Jackson presents the case that many of the scenes in Ian Fleming’s James Bond books (and the movies that followed the books) are based upon the adventures of ‘Tommy’ Yeo-Thomas.

Posted in In the news | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on In the news: The White Rabbit

This week in the War, 7–13 October 1940: Five reasons why Hitler did not invade Britain

This week in the war, on 12 October 1940, Hitler postponed his planned invasion of Britain, Operation Sealion, until the spring of 1941. (By then, of course, he would have a new enemy and a different country to invade).

Despite the fact that most people in Britain thought Hitler was coming—see the poster to the left—here are at least five reasons why he didn’t. (Maybe you can think of some others?):

(1) The Royal Navy was far too powerful. Derek Robinson makes this point very strongly in his book Invasion 1940 (Carroll & Graf, NY, 2005). A few destroyers or a cruiser would run amok amongst the German invasion barges. [It’s interesting to speculate what would have happened if Hitler could have persuaded the Italian navy to help out, or even the still powerful navy of Vichy France, smarting as it was from British attacks at Oran and Dakar]. Unfortunately for Hitler, the German battleship Bismarck did not become fully operational until the spring of 1941, and her sister ship Tirpitz was later still.

(2) Hitler had effectively given up on winning the Battle of Britain. And without control of the skies over southern England, Hitler knew that Sealion was dead in the water. [If Germany had won the Battle of Britain, life in the British Isles would have become very unpleasant. Who knows what would have happened next?]

(3) Hitler was an opportunist, a bluffer ready to roll the dice and see what happened. Had he been seriously opposed (by France or Britain) during his sabre-rattling before invading the Rhineland, or Austria, or Czechoslovakia, it’s possible he would have backed down. Perhaps invading Poland was a roll too many. In any case, an argument can be made for Operation Sealion being ninth-tenths bluff.

(4) Hitler liked the British. (Read Mein Kampf, if you don’t believe me). He truly did not want to conquer them. He wanted an arrangement: the British Empire would control the seas and beyond, the German Empire would control Europe to the Urals and beyond. Deputy Fuehrer Rudolf Hess would eventually be dispatched to Scotland (10 May 1941) to float this idea yet again before anyone who’d listen.

(5) Hitler really wanted to invade the Soviet Union. (Again, read Mein Kampf). He saw the peoples of Eastern Europe as his natural enemy. They were non-Aryans, and needed to be vanquished to make way for German expansion into new territory, the much-needed lebensraum. Once Russia was conquered (by December 1941, at the latest, he thought), then Britain’s last possibility for an ally would have disappeared and the British would be inclined to make peace. At this stage of the game, Hitler did not envisage the USA entering the war.

Have I missed anything?

Readers who like a touch of whimsy will enjoy reading the leaflet on the right. It’s phoney, of course,

In January 1943, RAF planes dropped hundreds of such leaflets over the island of Bermuda as part of a training exercise (and also to raise money for the sale of wartime savings certificates). Owing to it’s mid-Atlantic location, Bermuda was a key Allied base during WWII. The threat of German special forces, perhaps landing on the island from submarines, was seriously considered.

Thanks are due to the Bermuda Government Archives on Parliament Street, Hamilton, for providing me with a copy of the above. (Their original is beige-coloured. A version of the same leaflet, but printed on green, can be seen a few streets away at the Museum of the Bermuda Historical Society).

 

Posted in World War II | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on This week in the War, 7–13 October 1940: Five reasons why Hitler did not invade Britain